It’s awful how, as a reader of a comic about timetravel, I’m always out of time. I read (again) the page, and I decided to post a comment about “the insane passion of classic scholars for allitteration” shown by Roy.
I open the comments, and the first one is about the same phrase.
Ok, it’s what I’d say, but…
I just love Roy’s facial expression in panel 3 as he complains about “the insane circularity” of the logic. And, in a way, he’s right. In a 100% deterministic universe, nothing they do will change what’s happened/about to happen, but in that case, there’s no free will (Alas, poor Roy!). However, even if it’s not 100% deterministic, it’s unlikely that the universe will allow a paradox/broken causal loop, and that their actions will change what happened in the past, so all they’re really doing by trying to send Stanley back is prevent a change to the timeline, not a paradox.
@ Nobody: I know what you’re up to! You ain’t foolin’ me!
@ Anybody: I dunno… you might want to be careful about that guy. I’ve heard some nasty rumors.
@ danny & Lupo: Thanks! John was the one who came up with that line. He’s a classics major, so I guess this stuff just flows from him naturally.
@ macsnafu: It’s unlikely the that universe would allow a paradox, but it’s hard to know for sure. If it IS possible, the consequences might be disastrous. I think Milo and Jen are just being cautious more than anything.
It’s like what Doc Brown said in Back to the Future II: “[It] could create a time paradox, the result of which could cause a chain reaction that would unravel the very fabric of the space-time continuum and destroy the entire universe! Granted, that’s worst-case scenario. The destruction might in fact be very localized, limited to merely our own galaxy”
“curse this foiling foamy phalanx” wow. haven’t heard beautiful dialog like that in a long time. lol.
[Reply]
Oh, the irony of Roy being the one to send the Stanleys back! But I still don’t get why there were so many of them?
[Reply]
testing gravatar
[Reply]
@macsnafu: Don’t worry, you haven’t missed anything. Just hold tight; all shall be explained.
[Reply]
This was funny.
[Reply]
Hey! I’m not betraying Anybody! Just ask him.
[Reply]
It’s true–Nobody totally did NOT betray me.
[Reply]
It’s awful how, as a reader of a comic about timetravel, I’m always out of time. I read (again) the page, and I decided to post a comment about “the insane passion of classic scholars for allitteration” shown by Roy.
I open the comments, and the first one is about the same phrase.
Ok, it’s what I’d say, but…
[Reply]
ERRATA CORRIGE
The last line has to be:
“Ok, it’s NOT what I’d say, but…”
[Reply]
I just love Roy’s facial expression in panel 3 as he complains about “the insane circularity” of the logic. And, in a way, he’s right. In a 100% deterministic universe, nothing they do will change what’s happened/about to happen, but in that case, there’s no free will (Alas, poor Roy!). However, even if it’s not 100% deterministic, it’s unlikely that the universe will allow a paradox/broken causal loop, and that their actions will change what happened in the past, so all they’re really doing by trying to send Stanley back is prevent a change to the timeline, not a paradox.
[Reply]
@ Nobody: I know what you’re up to! You ain’t foolin’ me!
@ Anybody: I dunno… you might want to be careful about that guy. I’ve heard some nasty rumors.
@ danny & Lupo: Thanks! John was the one who came up with that line. He’s a classics major, so I guess this stuff just flows from him naturally.
@ macsnafu: It’s unlikely the that universe would allow a paradox, but it’s hard to know for sure. If it IS possible, the consequences might be disastrous. I think Milo and Jen are just being cautious more than anything.
It’s like what Doc Brown said in Back to the Future II: “[It] could create a time paradox, the result of which could cause a chain reaction that would unravel the very fabric of the space-time continuum and destroy the entire universe! Granted, that’s worst-case scenario. The destruction might in fact be very localized, limited to merely our own galaxy”
[Reply]
And it’s pointing power was really too much for a man…
I wonder if Godzilla or Superman would have done the same mistake…
[Reply]
Well, Superman is, in the end, still a man. Godzilla, though … Godzilla can handle anything!
[Reply]